注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

齐塔人之声中文站

ZETA TALK

 
 
 

日志

 
 

齐塔人之声2011年12月11日第271期新闻简报(翻译完毕)  

2011-12-12 14:30:30|  分类: 新闻简报 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

Olsen the Amateur

业余爱好者奥尔森

Is Rolf Olsen an amateur astronomer or a brilliant innovator? He is both. With amateur equipment, this amateur developed a technique to eliminate the glare from a nearby sun, allowing a detailed examination of the solar system of planets around the Beta Pictoris star. Where this had been accomplished with observatory equipment, it had not been thought possible with amateur equipment.

罗尔夫奥尔森是个天文爱好者还是杰出的创新者?二者皆是。用一台业余的设备,这名爱好者发明了一种剔除附近恒星的眩光的技巧,以便对绘架座某恒星周围的行星太阳系做出详细检查。通常这些工作是通过天文台设备来完成的,通过业余设备来观测被认为是不可能的。

NZer Captures First Photos of Another Solar System

新西兰人捕获了第一张另一个太阳系的照片
November 28, 2011
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10769324

An astronomer has captured the first amateur pictures of another solar system from a tiny telescope in his back yard. The material that forms the proto-planetary disc around Beta Pictoris has been photographed by large observatories often before, but it was not thought possible for amateurs to take a picture of the system, because of the glare from the star itself. But by capturing an image of a similar star and subtracting it from the picture of Beta Pictoris, Olsen was able to eliminate the stellar glare, revealing the dust disk.

   

Kiwi's Space Photos Stun Astronomers

新西兰人的太空照片震惊了天文学家
November 28, 2011
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6046887/Kiwis-space-photos-stun-astronomers

Aucklander Rolf Olsen has captured the star Beta Pictoris, and the disk of debris and dust orbiting it, in a stunning image that has amazed astronomers worldwide. He's proved it's possible to do it with amateur equipment. Olsen first ventured into astro-photography in 2003, but has owned telescopes since 1990. Olsen moved to New Zealand in 2003 from Denmark. The main difficulty is the overwhelming glare from Beta Pictoris itself which completely drowns out the dust disk that is circling very close to the star. Olsen had thought it was impossible to block out the glare using amateur equipment, but had second thoughts after reading a scientific paper from 1993 Observation of the central part of the beta Pictoris disk with an anti-blooming CCD.

Why is this significant? There is currently a cover-up over the nearby presence of Planet X, which stands between the Earth and Sun and is lost in the glare of the Sun. Sunlight coming through the haze of the vast dust cloud shrouding Planet X makes it appear as a dim fuzz-ball, except for the rare occasions when a flash of sunlight glints off the edge of the dust, creating the impression of a Second Sun rising or setting. Would this new technique, allowing amateur equipment to photograph Planet X itself, challenge the cover-up over the presence of Planet X? Note the clue in the above news article: "Olsen first ventured into astro-photography in 2003, but has owned telescopes since 1990. Olsen moved to New Zealand in 2003 from Denmark." Per the Zetas, none of this is a coincidence.

为什么说这意义重大?当前对 附近X星的存在 存在掩盖活动,X星正位于地球和太阳之间并且迷失在耀眼的阳光之中。穿过X星周围大量尘埃云的阴霾的太阳光使得X星看起来像一个模糊的绒毛球,除此之外偶尔太阳光闪过尘埃云的边缘,造成了第二个太阳升起或下落的印象。这项新技术,能否允许业余设备拍摄到X星本体,向 对X星的掩盖活动发起挑战?注意到上面文章中的线索:"奥尔森第一次进入天文摄影领域是在2003年,但是从1990年开始就拥有了望远镜。奥尔森于2003年从丹麦搬到了新西兰。"根据齐塔人的说法,这不是巧合。

ZetaTalk Comment 12/3/2011: There is a story hidden within this story. Olsen moved to New Zealand from Denmark in 2003, a time when we were predicting the Pole Shift to strike suddenly, "shortly after May 15, 2003". He moved from Denmark, a country that would surely go under the waves both during the Pole Shift (500 foot tidal waves) or in the Aftertime (when we predict the seas to rise 675 feet). He moved to New Zealand, to one of the best locations for surviving the Pole Shift on Earth. New Zealand will get a significant elevation boost during the plate movements, is a social democracy, and will be tropical in the Aftertime.
齐塔人之声2011.12.3评论:这个故事背后还有另一个故事。奥尔森在2003年从丹麦搬到新西兰,当时我们预测极移会在"2003.5.15后不久"突然到来。他从丹麦搬走,丹麦无疑会处在海面以下,无论是极移时(500英尺高的潮汐波)还是极移以后(我们预测海平面将上升675英尺)。他搬到新西兰,那里是在极移中生存下来的最好的地区之一。在板块运动期间新西兰将得到显著的海拔抬升,并且是敏猪的,极移之后将变成热带。
Olsen owned a telescope, and Planet X was visible inbound to amateurs during the winter of 2002-2003. Although ridiculed without mercy if they made any public announcements that a sighting of Planet X had been made, many amateurs were recording the movements of the Planet X complex, according to our coordinates, and sharing this information with each other. That Olsen began astro-photography in 2003 should not be a surprise, as this is when dramatic double helix photos of the Planet X complex were possible. Do we expect that amateurs will be seeking Olsen's guidance and copying his techniques to view current Planet X complex, lost in the glare of the Sun? They have already done so!
奥尔森拥有一台望远镜,而且X星在2002-2003年冬天的入境对于业余爱好者来说是可见的。虽然如果做出任何关于观测到X星的声明都会招致无情的嘲讽,很多业余爱好者都根据我们提供的坐标记录下了X星复合体的运动,并且将这个信息互相分享。奥尔森在2003年开始天文摄影不应该令人惊讶,因为这是可能明显观测到X星双螺旋照片的时期。预期业余爱好者是否会寻求奥尔森的指导并将他的技术复制过来观测当前迷失在太阳光线之中的X星复合体?他们已经开始这样做了!
And what are these amateurs likely to see? Today, the Planet X complex is showing up on SOHO and Stereo images regularly, as this active blog on the Pole Shift ning shows. NASA attempts to airbrush away this evidence, but mostly ignores it, claiming pixel defects or "compression artifacts". But the dramatic Winged Globe, looking identical to the appearance predicted by the ancients, can hardly be argued away. The Winged Globe has been showing up since March 27, 2009. But why has it continued to have a similar appearance in the years since it first appeared? Is Planet X not moving closer? This question was asked during a recent weekly Q&A session with the Zetas.

那么业余爱好者们又可能会看到什么呢?现在,X星复合体经常显示在SOHO和stereo图像上,正如这篇经常更新的博文显示的。NASA企图将这些证据涂改掉,但是大多数时候都是忽略,声称是像素缺陷或是"压缩失真"。但是戏剧性的带翼的圆盘,看起来与古老的预言相一致,几乎无法被驳倒。这个带翼的圆盘从2009.3.27就开始出现了,但为什么它现在的样子跟刚出现的时候没什么区别?最近的每周聊天问答中齐塔人被问到了这个问题。

ZetaTalk Comment 12/3/2011: When the Planet X complex was inbound in 2002, being identified on CCD imaging by a team of amateurs, it changed in nature. At first seen as a distinct fuzzy cluster with a bright star-like center, it became diffuse, and the center less dense. What was happening, on the images, was the spread of the complex, so that the Moon Swirls were not seen clustered close to the corpus, but rather the vast dust cloud was spread out. Nancy described this with an analogy of a buffalo stampede, first seen as a cluster from a distance and then later as the buffalo are visible as individual entities. As the stampede gets close, one does not see the entire herd, but only individual buffalo. This does not mean that the herd has gotten smaller. It means you no longer can see the entire herd!
齐塔人之声2011.12.3评论:当X星复合体在2002年入境时,被一队业余爱好者用CCD记录下来时,它在慢慢变化。起初看起来像是个明显的模糊一团,还有一个星星一样的中心,后来变得扩散了,中心越来越不密集。图像上发生这样的现象,是因为复合体的展开,这样卫星漩涡就不是围绕在本体周围的一团了,而是广阔的尘埃云展开。Nancy将其类比为一个水牛群,起初在很远之外看起来是一团,之后渐渐地水牛清晰可见为分开的个体。随着水牛群的接近,你看不到整个一群了,而只有一头头水牛。这并不意味着水牛群变小了。这说明你再也无法看到整个一群了!
In early 2003, when Planet X could still be seen in the night sky, photo captures of the complex first showed the complex as a whole. Now, with the complex spread out between the Earth and Sun, the Moon Swirls are seen individually, and often confused with the corpus of Planet X itself. The Winged Globe persona is showing the corpus of Planet X with its two dominant Moon Swirls on either side, the double helix constellation often distinctly visible in early 2003 photos. In these photos, as in the SOHO images today, the corpus is the minor player. It is the wings on either side that are noticed, and the trailing tail. Thus the shape reflecting light remains the same, but the amount of debris on either side, and the size of the corpus itself, cannot be determined. As it gets closer, you increasingly fail to see the complex - the corpus, Moon Swirls, and vast dust cloud - as a whole.
在2003年初,X星在夜空中仍然可见时,对复合体的照片拍摄首先显示了一个整体,现在,随着复合体在地球和太阳之间展开,卫星漩涡被单独地看到,并且经常与X星本体弄混。带翼的圆盘显示的是X星的本体及其两个主要的卫星漩涡,双螺旋结构在2003年初期的图片中经常清晰可见。在这些照片中,正如在现在的SOHO照片中,本体是配角,侧面的翅膀得到了关注,还有尾随的尾巴。因此反射光的形状保持不变,但是侧面碎片的数量,还有本体本身的大小,无法被决定。随着它越来越近,你越来越无法看到复合体---本体,卫星漩涡,还有大片的尘埃云----作为一个整体。


We are currently seeing the Planet X complex spread across our skies where before were seeing the complex as a whole, as these recent photos from an amateur astronomer in Italy show.

我们现在看到的X星复合体遍布天空,而不是之前看到的复合体作为一个整体,正如来自于意大利的天文爱好者的这些近期照片显示的。

2012 Revisited

2012再临

Where in all the ancient Mayan material does it say 2012? It doesn't, despite the hype. Planet X arrived in the inner solar system in 2003, as the Zetas predicted. Though they know the date of the pending pole shift, they are not allowed to tell mankind. Hungry for a date, speculation is rampant. But the date of December 21, 2012 is merely a guess, as any close look at the process by which it was derived will show.
在所有古老的玛雅材料中是否提到过2012?并没有,尽管被大肆宣传成这样。X星在2003年到达内太阳系,正如齐塔人预测的。尽管他们知晓即将到来的极移的时间,他们不被允许将之告予人类。渴望知道这个日期,各种猜测猖狂蔓延。但是2012.12.21这个日期仅仅是个猜测,仔细看看这个日期推导的过程你就会明白。
ZetaTalk Explanation 1/20/2007: We have stated that the Mayan Calendar, while correct in and of itself, was not lined up with the Gregorian correctly. It is a guess by those who arrived at the popular 2012 date, not a certainty. The Mayans had 3 calendars, one astrological which could be lined up with the Gregorian as there are hook points where, for instance, planets lined up or an eclipse might occur. However, there is no link between this calendar and the other two. One, a 260 day calendar, is a ceremonial calendar, and since some descendants are today practicing according to this calendar, it was assumed it would be linked back through the centuries. Not true, as pole shifts cause disruption in communities, who later try to resume their former ceremonies and strike out at a likely time in doing so. The third calendar is the long calendar, and this is the one ending at the assumed 2012 date. There was a glyph on a wooden arch, carbon dated which in itself is a guess, showing a presumed relationship between the ceremonial and long calendar. This relationship itself is a guess, but based on this guess, and the current 260 day calendar, which was reset by survivors in the past, the assumption of 2012 was made.
齐塔人之声2007.1.20解释:我们声明过玛雅历法,本身是正确的,但是并没有与格里高利历正确对应起来。那些得出盛行的2012的结论的人仅仅是在猜测,而不是确定的结论。玛雅人拥有三种历法,一个是占星历,它可以与格里高利历对应起来因为它们之间有对应点,比如说,行星对准或是发生日食。然而,这个历法和其它两部之间却没有对应,。一个是260天的历法,作为仪式历法,而且由于现在玛雅人的后裔正在按照这个历法施行,人们假定它可以一直对应到许多世纪以前。这不是真的,因为极移会导致团体发生混乱,之后他们试图恢复之前的仪式但是只能找到一个接近的时间。举例来说,如果在即将到来的极移之后某人想庆祝圣诞节,他们很可能会找一个接近冬至的时间,这是能做到的最好的决定。第三个历法是长历,这个也就是人们假定会在2012年结束的历法。刻在木质拱门上的字符,通过具有猜测性质的碳素测定,显示了仪式历法与长历之间可能的联。这个联系本身也是猜测,但是基于这个猜测,还有当前的 由过去的幸存者进行了重置的260天历法 ,做出了2012的推测。

 

The 2012 date is still being used in headlines and by the media, however, just as it was used in book titles to sell books in the past few years. But where in the content of this news article does it say 2012? The content refers to vague references on the Comalcalco bricks of something arriving from the sky. No date reference. And the Tortuguero inscriptions refer only to various calendar segments, which cannot be determined precisely for the many reasons the Zetas have cited.

然而,2012日期仍在被媒体和新闻头条使用,正如在过去几年写在书名中来使书大卖一样。但是在这篇新闻文章里的内容中是否真的提到了2012?文章引用了科马卡科砖块中的暗示说某物会从天空中到来。没涉及到日期。而且托土盖罗碑文仅仅暗示了各种各样的历法片段,根据齐塔人引用的各种理由来说这无法被精确推定。

Mexico Acknowledges 2nd Mayan Reference to 2012

墨西哥承认玛雅人第二次提到2012
November 24, 2011
http://news.yahoo.com/mexico-acknowledges-2nd-mayan-reference-2012

Most experts had cited only one surviving reference to the date in Mayan glyphs, a stone tablet from the Tortuguero site in the Gulf coast state of Tabasco. But the National Institute of Anthropology and History said in a statement that there is in fact another apparent reference to the date at the nearby Comalcalco ruin. The inscription is on the carved or molded face of a brick. The date inscribed on the brick "'is a Calendar Round, a combination of a day and month position that will repeat every 52 years." The third glyph on the brick seems to read as the verb huli, "he/she/it arrives." Both inscriptions - the Tortuguero tablet and the Comalcalco brick - were probably carved about 1,300 years ago and both are cryptic in some ways. The Tortuguero inscription describes something that is supposed to occur in 2012 involving Bolon Yokte, a mysterious Mayan god associated with both war and creation. Some read the last eroded glyphs as perhaps saying, "He will descend from the sky."The Institute of Anthropology and History has long said rumors of a world-ending or world-changing event in late December 2012 are a Westernized misinterpretation of Mayan calendars.

ZetaTalk Comment 11/26/2011: Unlike the headlines, neither of these objects refers to the Gregorian year 2012. You have an ancient language no longer spoken or written so interpretation is a guess. You have a Mayan people practicing ceremonies today after a breach of hundreds of years so their ceremonial calendar is no longer a good guide and is a guess. You have glyphs whose date is a guess, established by carbon dating on wood which is imprecise or carved on stone which cannot be carbon dated. So you have a guess based on a guess based on a guess! All pointing, per those who want to sell books with 2012 in their title, to precisely December 21, 2012.
齐塔人之声2011.11.26评论:与标题截然相反,这些物体中没有一个提到了公历2012年。你们如此来解释一门不再被用来交流或记录的古老语言是一种猜测。你们的玛雅人在违背了几百年之后举行仪式所以他们的仪式历法不再是一个很好的向导而且也是一种猜测。符号的年代也是你们猜的,刻在木头上的符号通过碳素测定来不精确地确定时间,那些刻在石头上的碳素测定都没法使用。所以你们是在基于某个 基于猜测上的猜测 而猜测!对于那些在书名上写个2012来卖个好价钱的人来说,所有一切都精确指向2012.12.21!

2012 was used as a magnet, so that discussions about the many prophecies, the End Time prophecies, could be pointed into the future. When the 2012 craze first began, years ago, this was far into the future and thus considered safe by the establishment, who want first and foremost for their slave classes to tend to their jobs and not rush away from coastal cities. Where ZetaTalk was saying mankind should prepare now, move to their safe locations now, the establishment wanted the common man to think they had plenty of time to prepare. What will they do now that 2012 is upon them, and we are only at the start of the 7 of 10 scenarios? They will fog the issues, finding some reason to point into the future.
2012就像一块磁铁,这样关于很多末世预言的讨论,都可以被指向未来。当几年以前2012刚开始变得狂热起来时,在权势集团看来这还有很久因此是安全的,衙门首先考虑的是他们的奴隶阶级埋头工作,不要从沿海城市跑掉。当齐塔人之声主张人类应该现在就做准备,现在就搬到他们的安全地点去时,权势集团想让平民认为他们还有很多时间来准备。现在2012就在眼前了,而我们才刚刚进入第七阶段情节,权势集团该怎么办?它们将把这个问题糊弄过去,找些理由继续指向未来。
As the 2012 year is about to commence we should also remind the readership that the Zetas are not allowed to give the date of the pole shift. They are allowed to describe a sequence of events, such as the 7 of 10 plate movements now unfolding as predicted. They have been allowed to be very specific about the timeline during the Last Weeks, as by then it will be excruciatingly obvious that the pole shift is upon mankind. They have been allowed to state that the pole shift will occur at the end of a magnetic trimester. But just what year or what trimester within that year is something they are not allowed to reveal.
随着2012年即将开始,我们还应该提醒读者们齐塔人不被允许给出极移的时间。他们被允许描述事件的顺序,比如说第七阶段板块运动正按照预测展开。他们被允许非常详细地描述最后几周的时间线,因为到那时人类将会痛苦地发现极移很明显近在眼前。他们被允许声明极移将发生于某个磁场三月期的结尾。但是在哪一年或是一年中的哪个三月期会发生极移是他们不被允许透露的。
Prior to 2003 the Zetas stated that Planet X would arrive in 2003, and it arrived along a trajectory precisely where and when they said it would, visible in the night sky as it crossed over into the inner solar system between March and May of 2003, visible naked eye to the astonished ZetaTalk fans. But it did not pass. It did not cause a pole shift, which is still pending for the Earth. That portion of the date given by the Zetas was an admitted White Lie intended to get the common man to prepare and not delay. When the 2012 craze emerged, the Zetas again encouraged man to prepare without delay, stating the pole shift would occur prior to 2012, but later had to admit this was again just a nudge.

在2003年之前齐塔人声称X星将于2003年到达,并且它沿着齐塔人给出的预测轨迹路线精确地如期而至,夜空中可见并且随着在2003年三月到五月之间横穿太阳系,齐塔人之声的粉丝吃惊地发现它肉眼可见。但是它还没走。它还未造成极移,极移仍然在地球的未来中等待着。齐塔人给出的日期那部分被承认是善意的谎言,意图让公众做好准备不要拖延。当2012狂热出现时,齐塔人再次鼓励公众立即准备,声称极移将在2012之前发生,但是最近不得不承认这仅仅是另一次敦促。



ZetaTalk Admission 7/11/2009: We are not allowed to give a date. In that stating "before 2012" is in a manner of speaking "giving a date", this should be taken with a grain of salt. Nonetheless, we are advising people, as we have since the start of ZetaTalk, to take action, not to wait. Get your ass prepared, and stop thinking of the exact date! That's our message to you.
齐塔人之声2009.7.11承认:我们不被允许给出日期。既然声称"2012之前"就相当于"给出日期",你应当有保留地看待。尽管如此,我们在建议大家,正如我们从齐塔人之声一开始就做的,建议大家采取行动,不要等待。赶紧抬屁股收拾东西,别指望精确的日期!这就是我们给你们的信息。
At the start of the ZetaTalk sage the Zetas predicted the globe would go into a second Great Depression, that crop shortages and weather extremes would occur, that erratic tides and an almost exponential increase in earthquakes would occur. All this has occurred as predicted. And recently they with great specificity described the 7 of 10 scenarios, plates movements which are unfolding as described, albeit not as quickly as predicted. Will the pole shift occur within 2012? At present we are in the 7 of 10 scenarios, to be followed by the 8 of 10 phase. Just how this lines up with the calendar it not to be revealed. When the very precisely predicted 9 of 10 Last Weeks occur mankind will have no doubt, nor will they have any doubt when the even more precisely predicted 10 of 10 - the pole shift itself - occurs.

在齐塔人之声传奇一开始齐塔人预测全球将陷入第二次大萧条,将会出现作物歉收还有极端天气,将会出现古怪的潮汐还有几乎指数级增长的地震。所有这些都按照预测发生了。而且最近他们无比详细地描述了第七阶段情节,板块运动正按照描述展开,虽然没有预测的那么快。极移是否会在2012年内发生?目前我们处在第七阶段情节之中,之后就是第八阶段。而这与日历怎样对应起来不会被透露。当第九阶段最后几周非常精确的预测真实上演时人类将不会有任何疑问,他们也不会怀疑更加精确的第十阶段的预测----极移本身----的发生。

Atlantic Stretch

大西洋拉伸

Is there a connection between the recent restlessness in the Canary Islands and a collapsing building in Lagos on November 29, dual beaver dams collapsing north of Toronto on December 1, and a giant wave swamping a ferry between Norway and Denmark on December 3? The connection is likely a tearing Atlantic Rift, so aptly pointed out on this Pole Shift ning blog. There have been several quakes along the Atlantic Rift of late.

最近 加纳利群岛的躁动不安 和 11.29拉各斯的一幢建筑倒塌 ,还有 12.1多伦多北部的两个海狸水坝的倒塌 与 12.3席卷驶于挪威与丹麦之间的轮船的大浪 之间有什么关系么?其中的联系可能是大西洋裂谷的撕裂,在这篇poleshiftning博文中恰当地指了出来。

2011-11-29 Mag 4.6 CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE大西洋中脊中部

2011-12-01 Mag 5.2 NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE大西洋中脊北部

2011-12-04 Mag 5.2 NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE大西洋中脊北部

2011-12-04 Mag 4.9 NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE 大西洋中脊北部

As Africa begins its silent roll, it drops and skews sideways a bit, separating along the Mediterranean and down through the Red Sea, thereby allowing the lower part of Africa to pull toward the Indian Ocean. It is known that the Red Sea is pulling apart, as is the Rift Valley in Africa, but Nigeria is stressed also, likewise being pulled apart. Thus the sudden and completely unexpected toppling of a building in Lagos.

由于非洲开始了其安静的滚动,它下落并稍微向一侧倾斜,沿着地中海分开直到红海,因此允许非洲下部被拉向印度洋。众所周知红海正在撕开,和非洲裂谷一样,但是尼日利亚也受到了压力,同样被撕开。因此拉各斯会发生突然并且完全出乎预料的倒塌。

Collapsed Building at Oba Akran Ikeja Lagos

拉各斯伊克贾Oba Akran路的建筑倒塌
November 29, 2011
http://mannamart.blogspot.com/2011/11/collapsed-building

A building located at 114 Oba Akran Road in Ikeja collapsed without much warning. The building, which was a cold room began to shake a few minutes before it collapsed.

If the Magnitude 4.6 along the Central Mid-Atlantic Ridge on November 29 caused this collapse, indirectly, then did the Magnitude 5.2 in the North Atlantic Ridge on December 1 cause dual beaver dam collapses north of Toronto? Beaver dams simply do not collapse. These busy little dam builders operate by instinct, so that such a thing as "human error" simply does not occur.

如果11.29沿着大西洋中脊中部的4.6级地震间接导致了这次倒塌, 那么是不是12.1北大西洋中脊的5.2级地震造成了多伦多北部两个海狸水坝的倒塌呢?海狸水坝一般不会倒塌。这些忙碌的小小水坝建造者是出于本能来操作,所以不会发生那些"人为误差"。

Beaver Dam Construction

海狸水坝
http://www.trapperman.com/trapperman/article_four.html

Beavers have good reason for building their permanent dams on a clay bottom. When the beaver uses sticks, poles, limbs or other woody material, the heavy end of this wood is placed on the dam and the smaller ends are on the lower side of the dam. When the water is high and there is force against the upper side of the dam, the smaller ends of the poles and limbs dig into the bottom on the lower side of the dam and help hold the dam in place. Beavers seem to have a preference for waterlogged wood gathered from the bottom of streams or other bodies of water for dam construction. This material doesn't float because of its waterlogged condition.

What caused dual beaver dams to collapse, then? A close look at the area shows many rivers on all sides, close enough to the Seaway to be considered in the Seaway stretch zone. The rivers were pulled apart!

那么又是什么导致了两个海狸水坝的倒塌?仔细看看该地区到处都是河流,足够接近被认为是河道拉伸区域的河道。河流在撕裂!

Collapse of Beaver Dam hits Remote Road

倒塌的海狸水坝殃及偏僻的道路
December 1, 2011
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Collapse+beaver+hits

The collapse of two beaver dams in the village of St. C?me, about 110 kilometres north of Montreal just south of Mont Tremblant Park, washed out substantial chunks of a local road. The duo of dam collapses, about a half-hour apart, have reportedly crippled the area's municipal water supply, normally fed by a mountaintop lake that hosts the rodents.

Is there also a relationship between the Magnitude 5.2 and 4.9 quakes on the North Atlantic Ridge on December 4 and the giant wave that washed over a ferry traveling between Norway and Denmark? Buoys in the Norwegian Sea or the North Sea did not go on alert. It is known that the Eurasian Plate is being pulled apart, with a stretch zone across Europe causing the trumpets of Kiev to set the reservoir singing, as noted in Issue 255 of this newsletter, and the Horn of Belarus to set the river to singing, as noted in Issue 257 of this newsletter. A close look at the channel between Norway and Denmark shows this is deep water, where the land masses are pulling apart! It was not so much the Atlantic Ridge quakes causing an increase in this separation, it was the reverse. The adjustment below the ferry caused the North Atlantic quakes!

12.4北大西洋中脊发生的5.2级和4.9级地震与冲刷行驶于挪威和丹麦的轮船之间又是不是有什么联系呢?挪威海或是北海的浮标并未报警。众所周知欧亚大陆板块正在被撕开,伴随着穿越欧洲的拉伸区域导致了由于水库的振鸣而产生的基辅的号角声,正如第255期新闻简报中记载的,还有白俄罗斯的因河流的振鸣形成的喇叭声,正如第257期新闻简报中记载的。仔细查看挪威和丹麦之间的海峡,可以看出这里的水很深,大陆块在此处被扯开!并不是大西洋中脊的地震导致了这个分离的加剧,恰恰相反,在轮船下方的调整导致了北大西洋的地震!

Giant Wave Washed over Ferry

大浪冲洗轮船
December 3, 2011
http://www.bt.dk/udland/kaempeboelge-skyller-ind-over-faerge

A large wave hit Saturday afternoon ferry Superspeed and led to an engine failure en route between Hirtshals and Kristiansand in Norway. A large wave that swept across the bridge. The wave hit a valve so that water came into the control panel.

NASA Attacks Nancy Lieder Again

NASA再次中伤Nancy Lieder

Once can be a mistake but twice shows a deliberate campaign! Surely NASA can read, and knows that the ZetaTalk website is not saying the passage of Planet X will occur on December 21, 2012! They have said the opposite, from the start. Yet Dick Morrison, a NASA scientist, mis-stated the truth on June 1, 2009 in a NASA Q&A.

一次可以说是搞错了但是两次说明这是蓄意的战争!很明显NASA认识字,而且直到齐塔人之声网站并没有说过X星得过境将发生在2012.12.21! 他们从一开始就在强调不是这样的。然而,迪克莫里森,一名NASA的科学家,在2009.6.1的NASA问答中虚报了事实。

ZetaTalk Prediction 7/3/2010: Of course Dick Morrison's lecture attacked Nancy and her message as the first and foremost enemy, because we and we alone are pointing to the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system, and advising people on how to look for it.

齐塔人之声2010.7.3预测:当然了,迪克莫里森的讲话攻击了南茜和她传递的讯息,将之视为头号敌人,因为只有我们正指出行星X存在于内太阳系之中,建议人们怎样去寻找它。

Now Don Yeomans, also of NASA, has been quoted by MSNBC mis-stating the same lies. Either no one at NASA can read, or this is a deliberate campaign. Take your choice. They are inept, or they are liars.

现在姚斯曼,同为NASA的人,被MSNBC引用故意声明了同样的谎言。要不就是NASA每一个人都不识字,要不就是说这是一场蓄意的战争。你自己选,他们要么就是煞笔,要么就是在撒谎。

2012 Apocalypse Fears Unfounded, NASA Says

2012世界末日恐怕没有事实根据,NASA说
December 9, 2012
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45618479/ns/technology_and_science-space/

Yeomans noted that well-known UFO aficionado Nancy Leider, who describes herself as being in contact with aliens from the star system Zeta Reticuli, first said Nibiru would cause widespread disaster in May 2003, only to later change her prediction to Dec. 21, 2012.

Nor does ZetaTalk describe a collision of planets, as it is termed, in all cases, to be a passage, yet Wikipedia mis-states this fact even though I, Nancy Lieder, as author of the ZetaTalk website, have officially informed them of their error.

齐塔人之声也没有描述过行星的冲撞,事实上,我们一直都将之称为过境,然而喂鸡百科误称了这个事实,即使我,nancy,作为齐塔人之声网站的坐着,已经正式地通知了他们这个错误。

  评论这张
 
阅读(2225)| 评论(12)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017