注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

齐塔人之声中文站

ZETA TALK

 
 
 

日志

 
 

【聊天问答】2014年9月13日 TBM - 900飞机失事,暗黑孪星,克拉斯诺雅茨克麦田圈  

2014-09-13 09:29:31|  分类: 聊天问答 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

Sep 13, 2014    Answer Archive    TBM-900 crash, Dark Twin, Krasnoyarsk CC

2014年9月13日  问答档案        TBM-900飞机失事,暗黑孪星,克拉斯诺雅克麦田圈

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for September 13, 2014

2014年9月13日齐塔人之声聊天问答

Something about the recent plane crash of the developer Larry Glazer yesterday just doesn't sit right with the given explanation. Yes, it did travel far over southeast US with everybody on board unconscious but something about it still doesn't sit right. It's also gotten a lot more press than one would expect for just a small plane crash. Providing it just wasn't an EMP zap. Can the Zeta's shed some light on it? He was a big developer in Rochester, NY. Rochester is just south of Lake Ontario of the great lakes and will be subject to the St. Lawrence Seaway adjustment and then rip. Also the tidal sloshing from the lakes during the severe wobble and shift itself. They mentioned on CNN 
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/06/us/unresponsive-plane-crash/  that his plane was a new TBM-900 2014 model. Other sites, and the link in the plane crash blog, are saying they were in a TBM-700, an older model. A little looking and the model mix-up in the news is explained here: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/TBM-Crashes-With-Unresponsive-Pilot222726-1.html  From that link: "A new TBM 900 (type is formally listed as a variant of the TBM 700)...". The Socata TBM-900 wasn't an old plane and is a very new one. It is also heavily electronic. TBM site for that plane: http://www.tbm.aero/index.php/tbm-900/tbm-aircraft/overview  He also took off in the morning and became unresponsive around 10AM EST. Just when the tail is starting to be in full range for any possible EMP zaps. An EMP zap to the electronics that control the cabin pressure could cause cabin pressure issues. Was their more to this crash than stated thus far? Or was it just simply another EMP zap? Was it a possible suicide or maybe some kind of assassination? If so can they comment on why? We've seen a plane assassination before that hit the news back in June with Lewis Katz of the Philadelphia Media Network to keep him quiet over Planet X. http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/07ju2014.htm

美国这个飞机失事的官方不作出解释,齐塔人能解释一下TBM-900飞机失事的事情吗?

This was neither a suicide nor assassination, nor was it due to faulty electronics on the new plane. We warned that increasing electronic failure would happen due to the charged tail of Planet X interacting with increased electronic screech in the ground, especially when a plane is over water. The East Coast at present is under an intense bowing pressure, a fact recently in the news when methane release was documented all along the East Coast. The outside of this bow will not snap, as the weak point in the N American Plate is the New Madrid Fault Line, which frankly might start adjusting at any moment. 

这个原因既不是自杀或暗杀事件,也不是这个新飞机的电子设备有缺陷。我们警告过,当行星X带电的尾巴与地面的电磁尖叫相汇时,将会有越来越多的电子设备受到冲击而损坏失灵,尤其明显的是靠近水域的飞机。美国的东海岸正处于激烈的弓形压力下,而且近期的新闻记录中也报道了有甲烷沿着东海岸释放而出。这个弓形的外点不会折断,因为美国板块的脆弱点处于新马德里断层带,老实来说,它随时都可能准备着开始调整。


What was the setting for this new TBM-900 to have an electronic failure? It was 10:00 am when the pilot reported problems and requested to dive to a lower altitude, a clear sign that the cabin was depressurizing. Planet X is to the right of the Sun, thus its influence, the hosing of magnetic particles from its N Pole, was ahead of the Sun’s high noon position vs a vs this plane. The rivers of N Carolina pool into lakes near Statesville, which in fact lies between two such lake swelled rivers. These are weak points in the crust, where the crust sags and thus as weak crust is more likely to be stretched thin – thus the electronic screech would be greater there. 


是什么导致了TBM-900飞机出现电子故障?那时处于上午10:00,当时飞行驾驶员报告了一些问题,并请求降低飞行高度,机舱有着明显的减压迹象。行星X正处于右侧,它的北极涌出磁性粒子,高高领先于太阳正午方位,与飞机相遇。北卡罗来纳州水塘的河流流入靠近斯泰茨维尔的湖泊,那里的湖泊间事实上有两条河流。这里是凹陷的外壳的脆弱点,在这弓形的脆弱之处更容易挤压拉伸——因而电磁脉冲在这里的规模和影响更巨大。

What can those accustomed to the convenience and comfort of flying do as the dangers of flying intensify? Stop flying except in emergencies, plot your path carefully based on all our prior admonishments, and use electronic communications rather than insisting on doing business face-to-face. Jetting off on a vacation to a foreign land is a modern advent, a recent convenience, not a right. Look to travel hundreds of years ago as a model, and apply any monies saved to plans and equipment for a survival site. This is our advice.


如何在飞行的危险性增加时更舒服安全的飞行呢? 除非在紧急情况下,否则你必须停止飞行,你要谨慎的阅读我们的警告与建议,适当合理的使用电子设备,不要等意外事故发生在你面前时才后悔。驾驶喷气式飞机到外国度假是一种时髦的行为,是现在新兴的便利方式,而非必要的旅行方式。借鉴几百年前人们旅行的方式,将资金用于生存的计划及设备。这就是我们的建议。

Is this the Dark Twin on this Italy webcam? Looking West at 22:00 hours on September 1 and 2, it shows up two days in a row, then briefly on August 25 when the Moon is not in the skies at all. Why does the Dark Twin bounce around and why is it illuminated mostly on one side? http://www.foto-webcam.ch/webcam/pognana1/#/2014/09/01/2200

这个意大利摄像头拍摄到的是暗黑孪星吗?

We predicted that the Dark Twin would try to pass the Earth in their shared orbit, moving out further into space and sliding behind the Earth. The Dark Twin is affected by the sweeping arms of the Sun, forever pushed forward in their shared orbit. But unlike the Earth the Dark Twin is not a magnetic planet, and thus is not caught in the grip of Planet X as firmly as is the Earth. In these webcam photos, the Dark Twin seems to move about, and this is due to the blooming effect, light pulled toward Earth’s gravity and likely also the Moon’s gravity. 


我们预测过暗黑孪星将试图从共享的轨道上穿过地球轨道,并且在太空中远远离开,滑向地球的背后。暗黑孪星被太阳约束着,在它们共享的轨道上被推进着。但是与地球不同,暗黑孪星不是磁性星球,并不像太阳抓住地球一样,将行星X抓住。在这些摄像头拍下的照片上,暗黑孪星似乎在移动,那是由于推进效应的影响。光线被拉向地球,这可能是月球重力的原因。

In that it is seen on August 25, dimly, when the Moon is not in the skies, this is not a ghost of the Moon in the camera. The uneven lighting where one side of the Dark Twin is brighter than another is explained by where reflected light goes. Those light rays reflected back toward Earth come from the side facing Earth, still behind the Earth in their shared orbit. Light rays from the Sun hitting the Dark Twin on the side away from the Earth bounce off into space and thus are only dimly seen from Earth. Where this 2014 view is looking West, the Dark Twin is still not quite directly behind the Earth as yet. 

这张照片在8月25日拍摄,朦胧状态,而且月球不在天空上,这不是摄像头前的月球幽灵。暗黑孪星的一侧的光线不均匀,这是由于光线反射的缘故,这些光线从侧面反射回地球,暗黑孪星处于地球后方,当时地球正处于它们的共享轨道上。暗黑孪星将来自太阳的光线反射向太空,因而在地球上隐约可见。这张2014年的照片是朝西方拍摄,暗黑孪星还没有直接在地球后方。

Recently in Krasnoyarsk, Russia, have appeared crop circles. The title of the article point to their alien origins in quotation marks. Russia is not famous for fake circles. Could our friends to give any comment about the authenticity of these circles and the message? [and from another] http://www.rg.ru/2014/09/05/reg-sibfo/krugi-anons.html

俄罗斯克拉斯诺雅茨克出现了麦田圈,是真的吗?这是在说些什么?


(这张图画的也太拙劣了,线都是曲曲拐拐的,忍不住要吐槽一下。)

There are several clues that this is not a genuine design, laid by the visitors. The first is the use of arrows, which is a very human symbol. The second is that by having arrows from every direction, the design lacks motion or evolution. Is this the Earth or Sun being compressed from all sides? This does not ring true. The third is that none of the arrows cross borders, but start smartly at a pathway or road as though human boundaries need to be honored in some way. Legitimate circle makers paint their designs freely, without such constraints. 

这里有一些线索显示这不是一个来自外星访客的真实麦田圈。第一,箭头的使用过于像人类的手法;第二,各个方向的箭头缺乏变化,这不真实;第三,箭头跨越国界,却为了规避人类的道路而变向。真实的麦田圈制造者是随心所欲的,不会有约束。



深蓝的童话
2014年9月13日 星期六

zetatalk版权所有
  评论这张
 
阅读(824)| 评论(1)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017